The central thesis of this text is the commitment to the resignification of the proper name in an analysis; to the extent that it denounces the subjective position, the family romance, the constitution of some symptoms, the desire of the Other, and even how it participates in the transference; that journey that tries to make the subject assume and appropriate the name that names him and then, yes, name himself; This journey, then, is involved in every analysis and constitutes an important, necessary and unavoidable passage of every analysis, like the work with and from the transference itself.

This work does not intend to answer all the questions that the approach to the name already raises, rather it will add others, and like the name itself, perhaps it conveys a void that is impossible to fill and impossible to name.

Impossible to name, such is the paradox of the name, which names the unnameable and in the attempt something is lost, and that loss is shown at the point that will be called the navel of the name, where there is no room for any interpretation, no ultimate meaning, that is why - as Lacan says - names are not to be translated and in fact they are not translated, but thanks also to that navel of the name, any attempt at interpretation is possible, it is possible for someone to be called, since each person will be able to interpret what his name wants to tell him when he is called by it from what constitutes the demand of the Other.

It's name time.

Co-edition with the Lacanian College of Psychoanalysis.