Originally this book led as a title the hate to poetry that, to say of its author, only emphasizes the hate to poetry pretendedly linked to the taste of the possible, but did not express it clearly. Thinking about the aversion that the beautiful poetry was inspired then, he highlighted the insulsion of lyricism. This because for him, the poetry does not delira, the delirium has the advantage of being involuntary on poetry. He believed that the only means to reach the true poetry was hatred, that poetry lacked strength except in the violence of the revolt. But poetry does not reach that violence but evoking the impossible. Because almost nobody understood the meaning of that title, he preferred to talk about the impossible, although, in the same way, this title is not clear either, because it can be defined as much as possible but not the impossible, but the author kept the hope that o...read more