One of the great interest of this work lies in the suggestion that in November 1973 something happened particularly noticeable in relation to the alleged transmissibility of psychoanalysis, something against which José Attal does not back down when it qualifies as a "new beginning".
The first two Propositions October 1967 on the psychoanalyst of the School, which supposedly regulate this transmission are disclosed antithetical, and appears, formulated in 1973, which is necessary to appoint, heráclitamente, a third Proposition October 1967. Lacan doubt autodesterritorializarse, the canonical statements of Lacanism who organized Proposition October are displaced, subverted, ie declared obsolete in several points: signifying chain, logical time, etc., and the formula "the analyst is authorized only by himself, "judged overwhelming, transformed.
The pass becomes a mutant assembly production of subjectivity, to take diagrammatically, and psychoanalysis, Lacan declared non-transferable, can find the conditions of their reinvention by each analyst. It then tries to think of different coordinates the question: "What witness?"