How not to make the necessary affirmative feminist politics only and always a claim for reified identities around the signifier "woman-mother"? In other words, how to be feminists without being "women", that is, how to be feminists beyond the patriarchal prescription of "being a woman". How then to get out of the paradox of being a woman? It is in the face of this paradox that the feminist politics of interruption rather than withdrawal propose a deep questioning of the modern mode of politics. This feminism does not seek inclusion, nor recognition. This feminism of interruption implies a double movement, first, it judges the elements that modern women have been constructed: these are the sentimental family, the sexual contract and the idea of a civic mother.

Consequently, it will not be an act of affirmative aggregation. And second, it displaces the feminist thesis of flight to the promised land of "women." In other words, the suggestive act of denying or inventing the names of women on the outside, in the margins, is not entirely useful either. You cannot be a feminist living only on the margins.

The politics of feminism will be elaborated in a complex game between the excluded and the included, the particular and the universal. That is why feminism is not a politics of interest. Feminism is a project of total transformation.