What is “queer”? What are its origins and theoretical tools? What are your discrepancies with a sector of feminism that considers you a Trojan horse within the movement? At a time when these debates seemed to have passed, the reaction of the so-called trans-exclusionary sector and the ultra-right have brought them back, fueling many misunderstandings. “Lo queer” is not a neoliberal product nor do queer people choose their sex/gender/identity just like that. Queer theories provide many keys to more fluently understand issues related to gender, sexuality, identities and corporalities, beyond binarisms. In addition, they take into account how gender, class, sexuality, age, ability, race, ethnicity, immigration status intersect... key issues to question the privileges of whiteness, class or citizenship, among others. Gracia Trujillo also claims that queer pedagogies reach the educational field, that activist journeys, coalitions between the feminist struggle and that of the LGTBI+ and queer collectives are known and valued. Recovering these pacts, focusing more on common objectives and less on identities, now acquires special relevance.