Since its beginnings, child psychoanalysis has been marked as different. Since its origins, it has carried out certain areas that turned it into a “specialty” and since then it has fought to defend the analytical character of its practice, but, above all, it tries to show that there are no essential differences between the psychoanalysis of children and that of Adults. A demand for legitimacy that insists today and that refers this practice with children to the discourse that precedes it.
Currently there are many works dedicated to the history of psychoanalysis, some works call more to scandal than to reflection, in them a certain disqualification and insidiousness is perceived towards the work of those who dared to investigate in the new field that analysis offered. childish. The truth is that those who have recklessly ventured into this practice continue to ask questions about what psychoanalytic work with children entails.
Profane women. History of child psychoanalysis, is a recognition of Anna Freud, Melanie Klein, Françoise Dolto, Hermine von Hug-Hellmuth and Maud Mannoni, women who despite their stories, or perhaps because of them, had the courage to enter the game of life of his little patients.

A book co-published with the Lacanian College of Psychoanalysis.