A chronicle has to do with time. with the time that passes and with the time that remains recorded in very brief writings. The reduced extension of these writing clippings does not imply discretion or modesty at all. Despite the maximum speed and minimum extension of the chronicle, his interest is in intervening. The chronicle does not hide. His vocation is the exhibition. The politics of the chronicle is precisely there, in the intervention of the present tense, insisting on a position that at certain moments takes the soft form of commentary and at others the angry figure of polemic. We know that the chronicle in its arrangement follows the ineffable line of time that records facts date after date, however, there is no impartiality. It is not the value neutrality that accompanies the notation, but rather a specific place of focus, making the chronicle always a partisan writing. The politics of the chronicle does not have altitude sickness, its intervention is always situated and it carefully chooses the means for its circulation.