When Miguel Morey Reading Foucault published more than three decades, there intended to carry out a comprehensive review of all Foucault's thought. Then came new materials, both in life Foucault as the posthumous discovery of a huge archive, which left Morey face a daunting task of updating their thinking. Foucault collected writings on much of what has been said, written and thought about Foucault Morey over three decades, with a significant difference from Reading Foucault, the volume that somehow completes and complements the appearance of this another. If this was to suggest a timely and schematically a reading that could delve the reader into the building complex conceptual Foucault in the first case, here Morey addresses and interpret various aspects that have to do both with the work of Foucault as receipt, impact, critical and controversial. So Morey wondered about their membership or detachment of the structuralist movement, his controversy with Derrida from the concept of madness in Descartes, the affinities with his friend Gilles Deleuze, his approach to the work of René Magritte or implementations of the Foucault's theory of power by, for example, his work with inmates. It is, in short, of reviewing the impact of the life and work of one of the most disturbing and original thinkers of recent times, to keep asking how we are limited by our own structures, and how far we could modify them to imagine realities different. After all, as explained by the Morey himself: "If Kant built his criticism of the notion of necessary limitation, the historical ontology of the present eddy (its task of problematization, if you prefer to say so) is carried out as a practical critique that questions over and over again and always, by the possible clearance limits. I understand that his was a thought of freedom and, above all, and so I have tried to present it. "