Until now, the revolts that shocked the contemporary Arab world have been seen in the light of a prism that, by criticizing their lack of work or purpose, did nothing more than obliterate the uniqueness of their power and, thereby, dismiss the pulsation of its underground forces that upset the categories of modern political philosophy and put notions such as State, People and Revolution in parentheses. The Intifada's bet is different: it seeks to think about the uniqueness of the revolt as a destitutive power –although necessary to the Revolution, always residual due to its inoperability– and contemplate its peculiar activity in it. If to use is to imagine, as Rodrigo Karmy points out, and to liberate is equivalent to exacerbating the potential of the imagination, in the insurrection of the revolt, ultimately, the power of the living and the possibility of making the world in the middle of its life are at stake. deep devastation.