Michel Tort's thought presents a curious amalgam between an orientation towards dialogue and debate, often harsh, with his fellow countrymen, and an openness to contributions from diverse geographical origins and from different social and human disciplines. In this sense, we can consider him as a psychoanalyst who has accepted to limit the claim of universality of many premises and assumptions of his discipline, in order to recognize the historicity, and therefore, the contingency, of clinical observations made in a social space and in a given time.
In the context of neoliberalism, various currents of thought and the technologies of the self that derive from them compete for the market of assistance to subjective discomfort. Although Tort sharply criticizes many of these alternative proposals, he does not fail to highlight the process of capture that some discourses that have e...read more