If everything is so bad why is it so difficult to build a critical theory? The XXI century intuit themselves on the brink of a precipice, but ignore how they got there, they find no trace of the past and the future does not offer much more light. Behind the impossibility of theorizing social transformation is an exhausted modern reason, passed a national state and a feral capitalism. Politics has succumbed to the economy, and this has transformed science in its main commodity. Is it possible to challenge a world that insists on its progress unstoppable modernizing progress?

There is in practice a counter-hegemonic globalization theorized that needs to get out of your game of trial and error. Through some theoretical resources of great originality, the author on this site lights to cross the longest tunnel: the sociology of absences (in charge of watching the silences of the past), the sociology of emergences (with the mission to detect emancipatory capacities of those protests to speak out) and the theory of translation (with a mandate to discuss force between the different bets and proposals for change to the search for what is common to them), united in the recognition of other ends with epistemicide (murder from other forms of knowledge) that the arrogant Eurocentrism has sown.