Is there esthetics in Marx? This is a question that immediately imposed on those who read the title of this book. The answer is no, if we understand a philosophical discipline aesthetics through whose predicates on the beautiful, the sublime and art discerns a peculiar kind of judgment or subjective experience of the phenomena .... But in the Marxian work is not possible to recognize an aesthetic in that particular sense, it does not necessarily mean that in a more general sense, it can identify some of the aesthetic dimension. Moreover, the thesis of this book on the subject is: the anthropological conception in Marx is indivisible from a certain aesthetic conception of man. It is here where the question of "communism" the question of "humanism" is debated and, linked to this,. A conception of man, while living there in the way of power-to, acting staying each time in relation to their own ability to use (and non-use) of their active forces, the conception of links the organs of the senses as historical products and metamorphic forms of social practice, as forms of externalization through which man comes to the presence considerably. This is the main thesis of this book.