What can you say about the link between the philosophical discourse of Levinas and sources "theological" in their thinking? From the outset, the term "theological" is a difficulty, because, precisely, Levinas does not make any theology, and Hebrew sources of his thought the Torah, Talmud, and some teachers of the Jewish tradition is not "theological" at the bottom of the letter. In the wake of the infinite probed how attention to the Hebrew source allows the philosopher to discover a layer of thought that had been hidden for a long time for theological construction, essentially Christian. Levinas does not propose any discourse about God, but the idea of God is recurrent in his work, and we must think of it wondering if you leave between the voice of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, or if not open the way maybe just new to the God of the philosophers. The main topics proposed works include the creation, prophecy understood as "psyche himself the soul", and eschatology and time, and the sanctity and proof of the absence of God. However, as the title of the work, the main thrust of the argument prevents the notion What can you say about the link between the philosophical discourse of Levinas and sources "theological" in their thinking? From the outset, the term "theological" is a difficulty, because, precisely, Levinas does not make any theology, and Hebrew sources of his thought the Torah, Talmud, and some teachers of the Jewish tradition is not "theological" at the bottom of the letter. In the wake of the infinite probed how attention to the Hebrew source allows the philosopher to discover a layer of thought that had been hidden for a long time for theological construction, essentially Christian. Levinas does not propose any discourse about God, but the idea of God is recurrent in his work, and we must think of it wondering if you leave between the voice of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, or if not open the way maybe just new to the God of the philosophers. The main topics proposed works include the creation, prophecy understood as "psyche himself the soul", and eschatology and time, and the sanctity and proof of the absence of God. However, as the title of the work, the main thrust of the argument prevents the notion of trace as a guide to the most secret hope in this thought so marked, however, the Catastrophe. philosophers, theologians, students of philosophy and theology, Judaist, the general public as guidance footprint in the most secret hope that thought so marked, however, by the disaster.